There’s a lot of stuff in that review that I would not write now, that I can’t stand behind. Every once in a while I will see a celebrity at a thing, and a line I wrote will come to me in my head, and I’ll be like, “Oh, God.” The first time I remember reading your byline was your review of “Sex and the City 2.” Yeah, I wrote some funny stuff, but was it justified? This certainly gives me more perspective on what it takes to make a piece of art and how hard it is to steer. In my 20s I was like unnecessarily because that’s an easy way to be funny and that’s just lazy, immature writing. Also now, once you actually make something and you see how many hours go into making one minute of television, I’m like, I just dismissed years of people’s lives: “Eh, it sucked.” Has this experience made you reconsider anything you wrote?ĭefinitely. Also I was a critic for a really long time, so I’m like, man, I hope karma’s not real because I was real mean to people’s babies. How does it feel to be on the other side as the co-creator of “Shrill”? REVIEW: Hulu’s ‘Shrill’ offers rare pleasures on the strength of ‘SNL’ star Aidy Bryant » You’ve written about pop culture as a critic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |